January 2, 2007
This was by far one of the most intense slave pieces I have read. Isaac was literally a slave as soon as he left his mothers womb. “-on the 14th day of May, 1822, A. D., that I inhaled my first supply of air, that my eyes, for the first time, were brought in contact with the beautiful light surrounding the terrestrial world, the earthly home of mankind, and the first sound of my infant voice was raised in shrill cries for a mother’s tender care and parental affection. This was the place of my nativity and the date of my birth. It was also the time that my mistress became the owner of one more slave and so much richer by my birth. My mother was, unfortunately, numbered in the family of slavedom, belonging to one Mrs. Hannah Woodland, and according to the institution of slave law, I legally, or illegally, became her property.” -Isaac Mason
This was interesting to me because he calls himself “property” which makes it seem like he even thought of himself as an object or a tool rather than a human being who could think and eat and do everything that white people could do. The mindset that was fed into the young children who were slaves is very shocking. They were taught to think like they were lower than everyone else and they were the dirt below the white people’s feet. By creating this sense of inadequate being, the slaves felt as though they never stood a chance against a race that was “obviously much superior”. Isaac was very obedient as a slave, and judging by the vocabulary that he uses he was obviously smarter than many other slaves who were never given any kind of formal education. This was a very interesting slave narrative and it really opened my eyes to the powerful psychological system that the slave owners used against the slaves.
1 Comment |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by nd06
November 15, 2006
Here is what the kid from Talimi Haq was talking about
Bitter Gourd
Comments Off |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by nd06
November 7, 2006
My position on Iraq and the current American involvment is that we should leave one quarter to about half of our troops in the Middle East and spread them out amount Iraq and Afghanistan to find Osama Bin Laden and try and build a democracy but not at the jeopardy of American lives. The soldiers who have had to stay in the service for longer than they intended should be relieved and new soldiers will take their place. We should worry more about what is going to benefit our country internally rather than immediatly looking towards international relations. By taking some of these soldiers home, many people will be satisfied. It seems like bringing soldiers home is almost more of an issue than the war itself. All that bumper stickers and signs say now are things such as “Bring Home the Troops” which is a major concern of many Americans which it should be. The recent sentence of death that was given to Saddam Hussein was looked at as a major liberation in Iraq and it already opened the doors to a better chance of finally achieving a democracy. This is the type of interaction that America should have. A look but not touch type of attitude that doesn’t encourage much of a violent reaction after making political or military moves.
Saadi Hamid, 63, sat in his photography shop staring up at a television carrying the second broadcast of the sentencing. He cried when he saw it the first time. But this time, when Saddam Hussein began to shout, “Long live the Iraqi people!” Mr. Hamid looked away and smiled broadly. “‘Long life for Iraqi people and he killed everyone,” he said. “No one can help him now.” (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/06/world/middleeast/06voices.html
This is showing just how explosive the reaction of the Iraqi people can be after events unfolded themselves no thanks to the American military being there. Rather than fighting this was for us to win, they are fighting for Iraq to stay together.
2 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by nd06